Pan, X. & Kortemme, T. Recent advances in de novo protein design: principles, methods, and applications. J. Biol. Chem. 296, 100558 (2021).
Google Scholar
Woolfson, D. N. A brief history of de novo protein design: minimal, rational, and computational. J. Mol. Biol. 433, 167160 (2021).
Google Scholar
Marchand, A., Van Hall-Beauvais, A. K. & Correia, B. E. Computational design of novel protein-protein interactions—an overview on methodological approaches and applications. Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol. 74, 102370 (2022).
Google Scholar
Korendovych, I. V. & DeGrado, W. F. De novo protein design, a retrospective. Q. Rev. Biophys. 53, e3 (2020).
Google Scholar
Khakzad, H. et al. A new age in protein design empowered by deep learning. Cell Syst. 14, 925–939 (2023).
Google Scholar
Arnold, F. H. Directed evolution: bringing new chemistry to life. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 57, 4143–4148 (2018).
Google Scholar
Zhu, J. et al. Protein assembly by design. Chem. Rev. 121, 13701–13796 (2021).
Google Scholar
Anfinsen, C. B. Principles that govern the folding of protein chains. Science 181, 223–230 (1973). Demonstration that a protein’s amino-acid sequence intrinsically encodes its native three-dimensional structure, establishing the foundational principle for all modern protein folding and design research.
Google Scholar
Leaver-Fay, A. et al. ROSETTA3: an object-oriented software suite for the simulation and design of macromolecules. Methods Enzymol. 487, 545–574 (2011).
Google Scholar
Kuhlman, B. et al. Design of a novel globular protein fold with atomic-level accuracy. Science 302, 1364–1368 (2003). Kuhlman et al. achieved the first atomic-level de novo design of a fully novel protein fold, providing decisive proof that computational methods can accurately encode and realize new three-dimensional protein architectures.
Google Scholar
Dahiyat, B. I. & Mayo, S. L. De novo protein design: fully automated sequence selection. Science 278, 82–87 (1997).
Google Scholar
Jumper, J. et al. Highly accurate protein structure prediction with AlphaFold. Nature 596, 583–589 (2021). Jumper et al. reported AlphaFold, a deep-learning model capable of predicting protein structures at near-experimental resolution, greatly enhancing our ability to infer protein structure from protein sequence.
Google Scholar
Abramson, J. et al. Accurate structure prediction of biomolecular interactions with AlphaFold 3. Nature 630, 493–500 (2024).
Google Scholar
Krishna, R. et al. Generalized biomolecular modeling and design with RoseTTAFold All-Atom. Science 384, eadl2528 (2024).
Google Scholar
Baek, M. et al. Accurate prediction of protein structures and interactions using a three-track neural network. Science 373, 871–876 (2021).
Google Scholar
Norn, C. et al. Protein sequence design by conformational landscape optimization. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 118, e2017228118 (2021).
Google Scholar
Pearce, R. & Zhang, Y. Deep learning techniques have significantly impacted protein structure prediction and protein design. Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol. 68, 194–207 (2021).
Google Scholar
Berman, H. M. et al. The Protein Data Bank. Nucleic Acids Res. 28, 235–242 (2000).
Google Scholar
Anishchenko, I. et al. De novo protein design by deep network hallucination. Nature 600, 547–552 (2021).
Google Scholar
Jendrusch, M. A. et al. AlphaDesign: a de novo protein design framework based on AlphaFold. Mol. Syst. Biol. 21, 1166–1189 (2025).
Google Scholar
Goverde, C. A., Wolf, B., Khakzad, H., Rosset, S. & Correia, B. E. De novo protein design by inversion of the AlphaFold structure prediction network. Protein Sci. 32, e4653 (2023).
Google Scholar
Yang, J. et al. Improved protein structure prediction using predicted interresidue orientations. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 117, 1496–1503 (2020).
Google Scholar
Wicky, B. I. M. et al. Hallucinating symmetric protein assemblies. Science 378, 56–61 (2022).
Google Scholar
Frank, C. et al. Scalable protein design using optimization in a relaxed sequence space. Science 386, 439–445 (2024).
Google Scholar
Ramesh, A. et al. Zero-shot text-to-image generation. in Proc. 38th Int. Conf. Mach. Learn. Vol. 139 (eds Meila, M. & Zhang, T.) 8821–8831 (PMLR, 2021).
Watson, J. L. et al. De novo design of protein structure and function with RFdiffusion. Nature 620, 1089–1100 (2023). Watson et al. presented RFdiffusion, a diffusion framework that enables accurate and versatile de novo protein structure and function design.
Google Scholar
Ingraham, J. B. et al. Illuminating protein space with a programmable generative model. Nature 623, 1070–1078 (2023).
Google Scholar
Ramesh, A., Dhariwal, P., Nichol, A., Chu, C. & Chen, M. Hierarchical text-conditional image generation with CLIP latents. Preprint at https://arxiv.org/abs/2204.06125 (2022).
Geffner, T. et al. Proteina: scaling flow-based protein structure generative models. in 13th Int. Conf. Learn. Res. https://openreview.net/forum?id=TVQLu34bdw¬eId=ypeoraSUA0 (ICLR, 2025).
Lin, Y., Lee, M., Zhang, Z. & AlQuraishi, M. Out of many, one: designing and scaffolding proteins at the scale of the structural universe with Genie 2. Preprint at https://arxiv.org/abs/2405.15489 (2024).
Yim, J. et al. SE(3) diffusion model with application to protein backbone generation. in Proc. 40th Int. Conf. Mach. Learn. Vol. 202 (eds Krause, E. et al.) 40001–40039 (PMLR, 2023).
Gainza, P. et al. De novo design of protein interactions with learned surface fingerprints. Nature 617, 176–184 (2023).
Google Scholar
Zambaldi, V. et al. De novo design of high-affinity protein binders with AlphaProteo. Preprint at https://arxiv.org/abs/2409.08022 (2024).
Yim, J. et al. Fast protein backbone generation with SE(3) flow matching. Preprint at https://arxiv.org/abs/2310.05297 (2023).
Chu, A. E. et al. An all-atom protein generative model. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 121, e2311500121 (2024).
Google Scholar
Liu, J., Guo, Z., You, H., Zhang, C. & Lai, L. All-atom protein sequence design based on geometric deep learning. Angew. Chem. 136, e202411461 (2024).
Liu, Y. et al. De novo protein design with a denoising diffusion network independent of pretrained structure prediction models. Nat. Methods 21, 2107–2116 (2024).
Google Scholar
O’Connell, J. et al. SPIN2: Predicting sequence profiles from protein structures using deep neural networks. Proteins 86, 629–633 (2018).
Google Scholar
Huang, B. et al. A backbone-centred energy function of neural networks for protein design. Nature 602, 523–528 (2022).
Google Scholar
Hsu, C. et al. Learning inverse folding from millions of predicted structures. in Proc. 39th Int. Conf. Mach. Learn. Vol. 162 (eds Chaudhuri, K. et al.) 8946–8970 (PMLR, 2022).
Dauparas, J. et al. Robust deep learning-based protein sequence design using ProteinMPNN. Science 378, 49–56 (2022). Dauparas et al. introduced ProteinMPNN, a deep-learning model that enables accurate and highly robust protein sequence design across diverse structural backbones.
Google Scholar
Goverde, C. A. et al. Computational design of soluble and functional membrane protein analogues. Nature 631, 449–458 (2024).
Google Scholar
Geffner, T. et al. La-Proteina: atomistic protein generation via partially latent flow matching. Preprint at https://arxiv.org/abs/2507.09466 (2025).
Ren, M., Zhu, T. & Zhang, H. CarbonNovo: joint design of protein structure and sequence using a unified energy-based model. In Proc. 41st Int. Conf. Mach. Learn Vol. 235 (eds Salakhutdinov, R. et al.) 42462–42483 (PMLR, 2024).
Campbell, A., Yim, J., Barzilay, R., Rainforth, T. & Jaakkola, T. Generative flows on discrete state-spaces: Enabling multimodal flows with applications to protein co-design. in Proc. 41st Int. Conf. Mach. Learn. Vol. 235 (eds Salakhutdinov, R.) 5453–5512 (PMLR, 2024).
Qu, W. et al. P(all-atom) is unlocking new path for protein design. Preprint at bioRxiv https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.08.16.608235 (2024).
Devlin, J., Chang, M.-W., Lee, K. & Toutanova, K. BERT: pre-training of deep bidirectional transformers for language understanding. in Proc. 2019 Conf. North Am. Chapter Assoc. Comput. Linguist: Human Lang Technol. Vol. 1 (eds Burstein, J. et al.) 4171–4186 (Association for Computational Linguistics, 2018).
Brown, T. B. et al. Language models are few-shot learners. in Proc. 34th Conf. Neural Inf. Process. Syst. (eds Larochelle, H. et al.) (NeurIPS, 2020).
Lin, Z. et al. Evolutionary-scale prediction of atomic-level protein structure with a language model. Science 379, 1123–1130 (2023).
Google Scholar
Brandes, N., Ofer, D., Peleg, Y., Rappoport, N. & Linial, M. ProteinBERT: a universal deep-learning model of protein sequence and function. Bioinformatics 38, 2102–2110 (2022).
Google Scholar
Nijkamp, E., Ruffolo, J. A., Weinstein, E. N., Naik, N. & Madani, A. ProGen2: exploring the boundaries of protein language models. Cell Syst. 14, 968–978 (2023).
Google Scholar
Madani, A. et al. Large language models generate functional protein sequences across diverse families. Nat. Biotechnol. 41, 1099–1106 (2023).
Google Scholar
Ferruz, N., Schmidt, S. & Höcker, B. ProtGPT2 is a deep unsupervised language model for protein design. Nat. Commun. 13, 4348 (2022).
Google Scholar
Alamdari, S. et al. Protein generation with evolutionary diffusion: sequence is all you need. Preprint at bioRxiv https://doi.org/10.1101/2023.09.11.556673 (2023).
Wang, X. et al. Diffusion language models are versatile protein learners. in Proc. 41st Int. Conf. Mach. Learn. Vol. 35 (eds Salakhutdinov, R.) 52309–52333 (PMLR, 2024).
Goel, S. et al. Token-level guided discrete diffusion for membrane protein design. Preprint at https://arxiv.org/abs/2410.16735 (2025).
Hayes, T. et al. Simulating 500 million years of evolution with a language model. Science 387, 850–858 (2025). Hayes et al. showed that a large language model can accurately simulate hundreds of millions of years of protein evolution, enabling unprecedented reconstruction, exploration and prediction of evolutionary trajectories.
Google Scholar
Regan, L. & DeGrado, W. F. Characterization of a helical protein designed from first principles. Science 241, 976–978 (1988).
Google Scholar
Huang, P.-S. et al. De novo design of a four-fold symmetric TIM-barrel protein with atomic-level accuracy. Nat. Chem. Biol. 12, 29–34 (2016).
Google Scholar
Brunette, T. J. et al. Exploring the repeat protein universe through computational protein design. Nature 528, 580–584 (2015).
Google Scholar
Dou, J. et al. De novo design of a fluorescence-activating β-barrel. Nature 561, 485–491 (2018).
Google Scholar
Doyle, L. A. et al. De novo design of knotted tandem repeat proteins. Nat. Commun. 14, 6746 (2023).
Google Scholar
Pearce, R., Huang, X., Omenn, G. S. & Zhang, Y. De novo protein fold design through sequence-independent fragment assembly simulations. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 120, e2208275120 (2023).
Google Scholar
Koga, R. et al. Robust folding of a de novo designed ideal protein even with most of the core mutated to valine. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 117, 31149–31156 (2020).
Google Scholar
Liang, H. et al. De novo design of a βαβ motif. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 48, 3301–3303 (2009).
Google Scholar
Pan, X. et al. Expanding the space of protein geometries by computational design of de novo fold families. Science 369, 1132–1136 (2020).
Google Scholar
Zhang, Y. et al. Improving diffusion-based protein backbone generation with global-geometry-aware latent encoding. Nat. Mach. Intell. 7, 1104–1118 (2025).
Google Scholar
Roel-Touris, J., Nadal, M. & Marcos, E. Single-chain dimers from de novo immunoglobulins as robust scaffolds for multiple binding loops. Nat. Commun. 14, 5939 (2023).
Google Scholar
Albanese, K. I. et al. Rationally seeded computational protein design of α-helical barrels. Nat. Chem. Biol. 20, 991–999 (2024).
Google Scholar
Correia, B. DiffTopo: fold exploration using coarse grained protein topology representations. Preprint at bioRxiv https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.02.01.578456 (2024).
Lu, P. et al. Accurate computational design of multipass transmembrane proteins. Science 359, 1042–1046 (2018).
Google Scholar
Xu, C. et al. Computational design of transmembrane pores. Nature 585, 129–134 (2020).
Google Scholar
Zhu, J. et al. De novo design of transmembrane fluorescence-activating proteins. Nature 640, 249–257 (2025).
Google Scholar
Vorobieva, A. A. et al. De novo design of transmembrane β barrels. Science 371, eabc8182 (2021).
Google Scholar
Berhanu, S. et al. Sculpting conducting nanopore size and shape through de novo protein design. Science 385, 282–288 (2024).
Google Scholar
Liu, Y. et al. Bottom-up design of Ca2+ channels from defined selectivity filter geometry. Nature 648, 468–476 (2025).
Zhou, C. et al. De novo designed voltage-gated anion channels suppress neuron firing. Cell 188, 7495–7511 (2025).
Google Scholar
Joh, N. H. et al. De novo design of a transmembrane Zn2+-transporting four-helix bundle. Science 346, 1520–1524 (2014).
Google Scholar
Courbet, A. et al. Computational design of mechanically coupled axle-rotor protein assemblies. Science 376, 383–390 (2022).
Google Scholar
Mills, J. H. et al. Computational design of an unnatural amino acid dependent metalloprotein with atomic level accuracy. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 135, 13393–13399 (2013).
Google Scholar
Hosseinzadeh, P. et al. Comprehensive computational design of ordered peptide macrocycles. Science 358, 1461–1466 (2017).
Google Scholar
Mulligan, V. K. et al. Computationally designed peptide macrocycle inhibitors of New Delhi metallo-β-lactamase 1. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 118, e2012800118 (2021).
Google Scholar
Bhardwaj, G. et al. Accurate de novo design of membrane-traversing macrocycles. Cell 185, 3520–3532 (2022).
Google Scholar
Salveson, P. J. et al. Expansive discovery of chemically diverse structured macrocyclic oligoamides. Science 384, 420–428 (2024).
Google Scholar
Peng, X. et al. Unified modeling of 3D molecular generation via atomic interactions with PocketXMol. Cell https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2026.01.003 (2026).
Rettie, S. A. et al. Cyclic peptide structure prediction and design using AlphaFold2. Nat. Commun. 16, 4730 (2025).
Google Scholar
Kong, X. et al. Peptide design through binding interface mimicry with PepMimic. Nat. Biomed. Eng. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41551-025-01507-4 (2025).
Google Scholar
King, N. P. et al. Accurate design of co-assembling multi-component protein nanomaterials. Nature 510, 103–108 (2014). King et al. achieved the accurate de novo design of multicomponent protein nanomaterials that co-assemble with atomic precision, demonstrating a general strategy for building complex higher-order architectures.
Google Scholar
Divine, R. et al. Designed proteins assemble antibodies into modular nanocages. Science 372, eabd9994 (2021).
Google Scholar
Bale, J. B. et al. Accurate design of megadalton-scale two-component icosahedral protein complexes. Science 353, 389–394 (2016).
Google Scholar
Lutz, I. D. et al. Top-down design of protein architectures with reinforcement learning. Science 380, 266–273 (2023).
Google Scholar
Huddy, T. F. et al. Blueprinting extendable nanomaterials with standardized protein blocks. Nature 627, 898–904 (2024).
Google Scholar
Wang, S. et al. Bond-centric modular design of protein assemblies. Nat. Mater. 24, 1644–1652 (2025).
Google Scholar
Walls, A. C. et al. Elicitation of potent neutralizing antibody responses by designed protein nanoparticle vaccines for SARS-CoV-2. Cell 183, 1367–1382 (2020).
Google Scholar
Chao, C. W. et al. Protein nanoparticle vaccines induce potent neutralizing antibody responses against MERS-CoV. Cell Rep. 43, 115036 (2024).
Google Scholar
Boyoglu-Barnum, S. et al. Quadrivalent influenza nanoparticle vaccines induce broad protection. Nature 592, 623–628 (2021).
Google Scholar
Hendricks, G. G. et al. Computationally designed mRNA-launched protein nanoparticle immunogens elicit protective antibody and T cell responses in mice. Sci. Transl. Med. 17, eadu2085 (2025).
Google Scholar
Yang, E. C. et al. Computational design of non-porous pH-responsive antibody nanoparticles. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 31, 1404–1412 (2024).
Google Scholar
Castells-Graells, R. et al. Cryo-EM structure determination of small therapeutic protein targets at 3 Å-resolution using a rigid imaging scaffold. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 120, e2305494120 (2023).
Google Scholar
Chen, Z. et al. Programmable design of orthogonal protein heterodimers. Nature 565, 106–111 (2018).
Google Scholar
Sahtoe, D. D. et al. Reconfigurable asymmetric protein assemblies through implicit negative design. Science 375, eabj7662 (2022).
Google Scholar
Bermeo, S. et al. De novo design of obligate ABC-type heterotrimeric proteins. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 29, 1266–1276 (2022).
Google Scholar
Kibler, R. D. et al. Design of pseudosymmetric protein hetero-oligomers. Nat. Commun. 15, 10684 (2024).
Google Scholar
Chen, Z. et al. De novo design of protein logic gates. Science 368, 78–84 (2020).
Google Scholar
Chen, Z. et al. A synthetic protein-level neural network in mammalian cells. Science 386, 1243–1250 (2024).
Google Scholar
Dowling, Q. M. et al. Hierarchical design of pseudosymmetric protein nanocages. Nature 638, 553–561 (2024).
Lee, S. et al. Four-component protein nanocages designed by programmed symmetry breaking. Nature 638, 546–552 (2024).
Shen, H. et al. De novo design of self-assembling helical protein filaments. Science 362, 705–709 (2018).
Google Scholar
Bethel, N. P. et al. Precisely patterned nanofibres made from extendable protein multiplexes. Nat. Chem. 15, 1664–1671 (2023).
Google Scholar
Shen, H. et al. De novo design of pH-responsive self-assembling helical protein filaments. Nat. Nanotechnol. 19, 1016–1021 (2024).
Google Scholar
Shen, H. et al. Nucleation limited assembly and polarized growth of a de novo-designed allosterically modulatable protein filament. Preprint at bioRxiv https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.09.20.613980 (2024).
Ben-Sasson, A. J. et al. Design of biologically active binary protein 2D materials. Nature 589, 468–473 (2021).
Google Scholar
Watson, J. L. et al. Synthetic Par polarity induces cytoskeleton asymmetry in unpolarized mammalian cells. Cell 186, 4710–4727 (2023).
Google Scholar
Li, Z. et al. Accurate computational design of three-dimensional protein crystals. Nat. Mater. 22, 1556–1563 (2023).
Google Scholar
Lanci, C. J. et al. Computational design of a protein crystal. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 109, 7304–7309 (2012).
Google Scholar
Chen, R. et al. An all-atom generative model for designing protein complexes. Preprint at https://arxiv.org/abs/2504.13075 (2025).
Pacesa, M. et al. One-shot design of functional protein binders with BindCraft. Nature 646, 483–492 (2025).
Google Scholar
Ren, M. et al. PXDesign: fast, modular, and accurate de novo design of protein binders. Preprint at bioRxiv https://doi.org/10.1101/2025.08.15.670450 (2025).
Vázquez Torres, S. et al. De novo designed proteins neutralize lethal snake venom toxins. Nature 639, 225–231 (2025).
Google Scholar
Glögl, M. et al. Target-conditioned diffusion generates potent TNFR superfamily antagonists and agonists. Science 386, 1154–1161 (2024).
Google Scholar
Kim, J., McFee, M., Fang, Q., Abdin, O. & Kim, P. M. Computational and artificial intelligence-based methods for antibody development. Trends Pharmacol. Sci. 44, 175–189 (2023).
Google Scholar
Wang, R. et al. A generative foundation model for antibody design. Preprint at bioRxiv https://doi.org/10.1101/2025.09.12.675771 (2025).
Cutting, D., Dreyer, F. A., Errington, D., Schneider, C. & Deane, C. M. De novo antibody design with SE(3) diffusion. J. Comput. Biol. 32, 351–361 (2025).
Google Scholar
Dreyer, F. A. et al. Computational design of therapeutic antibodies with improved developability: efficient traversal of binder landscapes and rescue of escape mutations. MAbs 17, 2511220 (2025).
Google Scholar
Bennett, N. R. et al. Atomically accurate de novo design of antibodies with RFdiffusion. Nature 649, 183–193 (2025).
Sahtoe, D. D. et al. Transferrin receptor targeting by de novo sheet extension. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 118, e2021569118 (2021).
Google Scholar
Sappington, I. et al. Improved protein binder design using β-pairing targeted RFdiffusion. Nat. Commun. 17, 1101 (2026).
Xu, X. et al. HELM-GPT: de novo macrocyclic peptide design using generative pre-trained transformer. Bioinformatics 40, btae364 (2024).
Google Scholar
Rettie, S. A. et al. Accurate de novo design of high-affinity protein-binding macrocycles using deep learning. Nat. Chem. Biol. 21, 1948–1956 (2025). Rettie et al. established a deep-learning framework that achieves precise de novo design of potent protein-binding macrocycles.
Bhat, S. et al. De novo design of peptide binders to conformationally diverse targets with contrastive language modeling. Sci. Adv. 11, eadr8638 (2025).
Google Scholar
Wu, K. et al. De novo design of modular peptide-binding proteins by superhelical matching. Nature 616, 581–589 (2023).
Google Scholar
Wu, K. et al. Design of intrinsically disordered region binding proteins. Science 389, eadr8063 (2025).
Google Scholar
Liu, C. et al. Diffusing protein binders to intrinsically disordered proteins. Nature 644, 809–817 (2025).
Google Scholar
Sahtoe, D. D. et al. Design of amyloidogenic peptide traps. Nat. Chem. Biol. 20, 981–990 (2024).
Google Scholar
Vázquez Torres, S. et al. De novo design of high-affinity binders of bioactive helical peptides. Nature 626, 435–442 (2024).
Zhang, J. Z. et al. De novo design of Ras isoform selective binders. Cell Chem. Biol. 33, 396–408.e7 (2026).
Chevalier, A. et al. Massively parallel de novo protein design for targeted therapeutics. Nature 550, 74–79 (2017).
Google Scholar
Fleishman, S. J. et al. Computational design of proteins targeting the conserved stem region of influenza hemagglutinin. Science 332, 816–821 (2011).
Google Scholar
Cao, L. et al. Design of protein-binding proteins from the target structure alone. Nature 605, 551–560 (2022). Cao et al. introduced a powerful approach for creating high-affinity binders solely from target structural information, greatly advancing de novo protein–protein interface design.
Google Scholar
Linsky, T. W. et al. De novo design of potent and resilient hACE2 decoys to neutralize SARS-CoV-2. Science 370, 1208–1214 (2020).
Google Scholar
Cao, L. et al. De novo design of picomolar SARS-CoV-2 miniprotein inhibitors. Science 370, 426–431 (2020).
Google Scholar
Ragotte, R. J. et al. Designed miniproteins potently inhibit and protect against MERS-CoV. Cell Rep. 44, 115760 (2025).
Google Scholar
Sesterhenn, F. et al. De novo protein design enables the precise induction of RSV-neutralizing antibodies. Science 368, eaay5051 (2020).
Google Scholar
Hunt, A. C. et al. Multivalent designed proteins neutralize SARS-CoV-2 variants of concern and confer protection against infection in mice. Sci. Transl. Med. 14, eabn1252 (2022).
Google Scholar
Lee, J. et al. The computationally designed TRI2-2 miniprotein inhibitor protects against multiple SARS-CoV-2 Omicron variants. Commun. Biol. 9, 224 (2026).
Case, J. B. et al. Ultrapotent miniproteins targeting the SARS-CoV-2 receptor-binding domain protect against infection and disease. Cell Host Microbe 29, 1151–1161 (2021).
Google Scholar
Koday, M. T. et al. A computationally designed hemagglutinin stem-binding protein provides in vivo protection from influenza independent of a host immune response. PLoS Pathog. 12, e1005409 (2016).
Google Scholar
Ragotte, R. J. et al. De novo design of potent inhibitors of clostridial family toxins. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 122, e2509329122 (2025).
Google Scholar
Lv, X. et al. De novo design of mini-protein binders broadly neutralizing Clostridioides difficile toxin B variants. Nat. Commun. 15, 8521 (2024).
Google Scholar
Ragotte, R. J. et al. De novo designed inhibitor confers protection against lethal toxic shock. Preprint at bioRxiv https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.08.23.608890 (2024).
Torres, S. V. et al. De novo designed proteins neutralize lethal snake venom toxins. Nature 639, 225–231 (2025).
Muratspahić, E. et al. De novo design of miniprotein agonists and antagonists targeting G protein-coupled receptors. Preprint at bioRxiv https://doi.org/10.1101/2025.03.23.644666 (2025).
Du, H. et al. A general system for targeting MHC class II-antigen complex via a single adaptable loop. Nat. Biotechnol. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41587-024-02466-y (2024).
Google Scholar
Du, H. et al. Targeting peptide antigens using a multiallelic MHC I-binding system. Nat. Biotechnol. 43, 1683–1693 (2025). Du et al. developed a multiallelic MHC-I-binding platform that enables precise targeting of diverse peptide antigens, offering a broadly applicable strategy for antigen-specific immunotherapies.
Google Scholar
Bryan, C. M. et al. Computational design of a synthetic PD-1 agonist. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 118, e2102164118 (2021).
Google Scholar
Yang, W. et al. Design of high-affinity binders to immune modulating receptors for cancer immunotherapy. Nat. Commun. 16, 2001 (2025).
Google Scholar
Silva, D.-A. et al. De novo design of potent and selective mimics of IL-2 and IL-15. Nature 565, 186–191 (2019).
Google Scholar
Chun, J.-H. et al. Design of a potent interleukin-21 mimic for cancer immunotherapy. Sci. Immunol. 10, eadx1582 (2025).
Google Scholar
Edman, N. I. et al. Modulation of FGF pathway signaling and vascular differentiation using designed oligomeric assemblies. Cell 187, 3726–3740 (2024).
Google Scholar
Berger, S. et al. Preclinical proof of principle for orally delivered Th17 antagonist miniproteins. Cell 187, 4305–4317 (2024).
Google Scholar
Keshri, R. et al. Direct cell reprogramming by a designed agonist inducing HER2-FGFR proximity. Preprint at bioRxiv https://doi.org/10.1101/2025.10.12.681903 (2025).
Abedi, M. et al. High-throughput de novo protein design yields novel immunomodulatory agonists. Preprint at bioRxiv https://doi.org/10.1101/2025.10.12.681920 (2025).
Expòsit, M. et al. Geometric tuning of cytokine receptor association modulates synthetic agonist signaling. Preprint at bioRxiv https://doi.org/10.1101/2025.10.12.681819 (2025).
Piraner, D. I. et al. Engineered receptors for soluble cellular communication and disease sensing. Nature 638, 805–813 (2025).
Google Scholar
Weinberg, Z. Y. et al. De novo-designed minibinders expand the synthetic biology sensing repertoire. eLife https://doi.org/10.7554/elife.96154.2 (2024).
Google Scholar
Li, Z. et al. De novo designed protein guiding targeted protein degradation. Nat. Commun. 16, 6598 (2025).
Google Scholar
Huang, B. et al. Designed endocytosis-inducing proteins degrade targets and amplify signals. Nature https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-024-07948-2 (2024).
Google Scholar
Tinberg, C. E. et al. Computational design of ligand-binding proteins with high affinity and selectivity. Nature 501, 212–216 (2013).
Google Scholar
Dou, J. et al. Sampling and energy evaluation challenges in ligand binding protein design. Protein Sci. 26, 2426–2437 (2017).
Google Scholar
Bick, M. J. et al. Computational design of environmental sensors for the potent opioid fentanyl. eLife 6, e28909 (2017).
Google Scholar
Park, J. et al. De novo design of a homo-trimeric amantadine-binding protein. eLife 8, e47839 (2019).
Google Scholar
Glasgow, A. A. et al. Computational design of a modular protein sense-response system. Science 366, 1024–1028 (2019).
Google Scholar
Polizzi, N. F. & DeGrado, W. F. A defined structural unit enables de novo design of small-molecule-binding proteins. Science 369, 1227–1233 (2020).
Google Scholar
Lu, L. et al. De novo design of drug-binding proteins with predictable binding energy and specificity. Science 384, 106–112 (2024). Lu et al. demonstrated that drug-binding proteins can be de novo designed with predictable binding energy and specificity, establishing a general strategy for small-molecule binding protein design.
Google Scholar
Thomas, F. et al. De novo-designed α-helical barrels as receptors for small molecules. ACS Synth. Biol. 7, 1808–1816 (2018).
Google Scholar
Yang, W. & Lai, L. Computational design of ligand-binding proteins. Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol. 45, 67–73 (2017).
Google Scholar
Zhou, L. et al. A protein engineered to bind uranyl selectively and with femtomolar affinity. Nat. Chem. 6, 236–241 (2014).
Google Scholar
Polizzi, N. F. et al. De novo design of a hyperstable non-natural protein-ligand complex with sub-Å accuracy. Nat. Chem. 9, 1157–1164 (2017).
Google Scholar
Lee, G. R. et al. Small-molecule binding and sensing with a designed protein family. Preprint at bioRxiv https://doi.org/10.1101/2023.11.01.565201 (2023).
An, L. et al. Binding and sensing diverse small molecules using shape-complementary pseudocycles. Science 385, 276–282 (2024).
Google Scholar
Marchand, A. et al. Targeting protein-ligand neosurfaces with a generalizable deep learning tool. Nature 639, 522–531 (2025). Marchand et al. demonstrated that protein–ligand neosurfaces can be accurately targeted using a generalizable deep-learning surface-descriptor framework, enabling de novo design of small-molecule-conditioned protein interactions.
Dauparas, J. et al. Atomic context-conditioned protein sequence design using LigandMPNN. Nat. Methods 22, 717–723 (2025).
Google Scholar
Mann, S. I. et al. De novo design of proteins that bind naphthalenediimides, powerful photooxidants with tunable photophysical properties. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 147, 7849–7858 (2025).
Google Scholar
Cho, Y., Pacesa, M., Zhang, Z., Correia, B. E. & Ovchinnikov, S. Boltzdesign1: inverting all-atom structure prediction model for generalized biomolecular binder design. Preprin at bioRxiv https://doi.org/10.1101/2025.04.06.647261 (2025).
Kong, X. et al. UniMoMo: unified generative modeling of 3D molecules for de novo binder design. Preprint at https://arxiv.org/abs/2503.19300 (2025).
Kang, S. et al. COMBINES-CID: an efficient method for de novo engineering of highly specific chemically induced protein dimerization systems. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 141, 10948–10952 (2019).
Google Scholar
Shui, S., Buckley, S., Scheller, L. & Correia, B. E. Rational design of small-molecule responsive protein switches. Protein Sci. 32, e4774 (2023).
Google Scholar
Leonard, A. C. et al. Rationalizing diverse binding mechanisms to the same protein fold: Insights for ligand recognition and biosensor design. ACS Chem. Biol. 19, 1757–1772 (2024).
Google Scholar
Foight, G. W. et al. Multi-input chemical control of protein dimerization for programming graded cellular responses. Nat. Biotechnol. 37, 1209–1216 (2019).
Google Scholar
Bialas, C. et al. Engineering an artificial flavoprotein magnetosensor. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 138, 16584–16587 (2016).
Google Scholar
Klima, J. C. et al. Incorporation of sensing modalities into de novo designed fluorescence-activating proteins. Nat. Commun. 12, 856 (2021).
Google Scholar
Beltrán, J. et al. Rapid biosensor development using plant hormone receptors as reprogrammable scaffolds. Nat. Biotechnol. 40, 1855–1861 (2022).
Google Scholar
Braun, M. et al. Computational enzyme design by catalytic motif scaffolding. Nature 649, 237–245 (2026).
Jiang, L. et al. De novo computational design of retro-aldol enzymes. Science 319, 1387–1391 (2008).
Google Scholar
Röthlisberger, D. et al. Kemp elimination catalysts by computational enzyme design. Nature 453, 190–195 (2008).
Google Scholar
Privett, H. K. et al. Iterative approach to computational enzyme design. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 109, 3790–3795 (2012).
Google Scholar
Obexer, R. et al. Emergence of a catalytic tetrad during evolution of a highly active artificial aldolase. Nat. Chem. 9, 50–56 (2017).
Google Scholar
Giger, L. et al. Evolution of a designed retro-aldolase leads to complete active site remodeling. Nat. Chem. Biol. 9, 494–498 (2013).
Google Scholar
Khersonsky, O. et al. Optimization of the in-silico-designed kemp eliminase KE70 by computational design and directed evolution. J. Mol. Biol. 407, 391–412 (2011).
Google Scholar
Blomberg, R. et al. Precision is essential for efficient catalysis in an evolved Kemp eliminase. Nature 503, 418–421 (2013).
Google Scholar
Reig, A. J. et al. Alteration of the oxygen-dependent reactivity of de novo Due Ferri proteins. Nat. Chem. 4, 900–906 (2012).
Google Scholar
Lombardi, A., Pirro, F., Maglio, O., Chino, M. & DeGrado, W. F. De novo design of four-helix bundle metalloproteins: one scaffold, diverse reactivities. Acc. Chem. Res. 52, 1148–1159 (2019).
Google Scholar
Summa, C. M., Rosenblatt, M. M., Hong, J.-K., Lear, J. D. & DeGrado, W. F. Computational de novo design, and characterization of an A2B2 diiron protein. J. Mol. Biol. 321, 923–938 (2002).
Google Scholar
Yeh, A. H.-W. et al. De novo design of luciferases using deep learning. Nature 614, 774–780 (2023).
Google Scholar
Anishchenko, I. et al. Modeling protein–small molecule conformational ensembles with PLACER. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 122, e2427161122 (2025).
Google Scholar
Lauko, A. et al. Computational design of serine hydrolases. Science 388, eadu2454 (2025). Lauko et al. demonstrated that serine hydrolases can be computationally designed de novo with high catalytic efficiency, establishing a general strategy for designing new enzymes.
Google Scholar
Elaily, W. et al. Computational design of a thermostable de novo biocatalyst for whole cell biotransformations. Preprint at bioRxiv https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.10.07.617055 (2024).
Kalvet, I. et al. Design of heme enzymes with a tunable substrate binding pocket adjacent to an open metal coordination site. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 145, 14307–14315 (2023).
Google Scholar
Reedy, C. J. & Gibney, B. R. Heme protein assemblies. Chem. Rev. 104, 617–649 (2004).
Google Scholar
Mann, S. I., Nayak, A., Gassner, G. T., Therien, M. J. & DeGrado, W. F. De novo design, solution characterization, and crystallographic structure of an abiological Mn-porphyrin-binding protein capable of stabilizing a Mn(V) species. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 143, 252–259 (2021).
Google Scholar
Hou, K. et al. De novo design of porphyrin-containing proteins as efficient and stereoselective catalysts. Science 388, 665–670 (2025).
Google Scholar
Huang, W. et al. De Novo design, directed evolution and computational study of heme-binding helical bundle protein catalysts for biocatalytic enantioselective Ge-H insertion. J. Am. Chem. Soc. https://doi.org/10.1021/jacs.5c13909 (2025).
Google Scholar
Zou, Z. et al. De novo design and evolution of an artificial metathase for cytoplasmic olefin metathesis. Nat. Catal. 8, 1208–1219 (2025).
Kim, D. et al. Computational design of metallohydrolases. Nature 649, 246–253 (2026).
Wolfe, S. A., Nekludova, L. & Pabo, C. O. DNA recognition by Cys2,His2 zinc finger proteins. Annu. Rev. Biophys. Biomol. Struct. 29, 183–212 (2000).
Google Scholar
Joung, J. K. & Sander, J. D. TALENs: a widely applicable technology for targeted genome editing. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 14, 49–55 (2013).
Google Scholar
Wang, J. Y. & Doudna, J. A. CRISPR technology: a decade of genome editing is only the beginning. Science 379, eadd8643 (2023).
Google Scholar
Milk, L., Daber, R. & Lewis, M. Functional rules for lac repressor-operator associations and implications for protein-DNA interactions. Protein Sci. 19, 1162–1172 (2010).
Google Scholar
Glasscock, C. J. et al. Computational design of sequence-specific DNA-binding proteins. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 32, 2252–2261 (2025).
Google Scholar
Quijano-Rubio, A. et al. De novo design of modular and tunable protein biosensors. Nature 591, 482–487 (2021).
Google Scholar
Zhang, J. Z. et al. Computationally designed sensors detect endogenous Ras activity and signaling effectors at subcellular resolution. Nat. Biotechnol. 42, 1888–1898 (2024).
Google Scholar
Zhang, J. Z., Ong, S.-E., Baker, D. & Maly, D. J. Single-cell sensor analyses reveal signaling programs enabling Ras-G12C drug resistance. Nat. Chem. Biol. 21, 47–58 (2025).
Google Scholar
Langan, R. A. et al. De novo design of bioactive protein switches. Nature 572, 205–210 (2019).
Google Scholar
Lajoie, M. J. et al. Designed protein logic to target cells with precise combinations of surface antigens. Science 369, 1637–1643 (2020).
Google Scholar
Rose, J. C. et al. A computationally engineered RAS rheostat reveals RAS-ERK signaling dynamics. Nat. Chem. Biol. 13, 119–126 (2017).
Google Scholar
Giordano-Attianese, G. et al. A computationally designed chimeric antigen receptor provides a small-molecule safety switch for T-cell therapy. Nat. Biotechnol. 38, 426–432 (2020).
Google Scholar
Praetorius, F. et al. Design of stimulus-responsive two-state hinge proteins. Science 381, 754–760 (2023).
Google Scholar
Guo, A. B. et al. Deep learning-guided design of dynamic proteins. Science 388, eadr7094 (2025). Guo et al. demonstrated that deep learning can guide the rational design of dynamic proteins, enabling precise control over conformational landscapes and function.
Google Scholar
Pillai, A. et al. De novo design of allosterically switchable protein assemblies. Nature 632, 911–920 (2024).
Google Scholar
Broerman, A. J. et al. Design of facilitated dissociation enables timing of cytokine signalling. Nature 647, 528–535 (2025).
Pyles, H., Zhang, S., De Yoreo, J. J. & Baker, D. Controlling protein assembly on inorganic crystals through designed protein interfaces. Nature 571, 251–256 (2019).
Google Scholar
Davila-Hernandez, F. A. et al. Directing polymorph specific calcium carbonate formation with de novo protein templates. Nat. Commun. 14, 8191 (2023).
Google Scholar
Saragovi, A. et al. De novo design of metal-oxide templating proteins. Preprint at bioRxiv https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.06.24.600095 (2025).
Blankenship, R. E. et al. Comparing photosynthetic and photovoltaic efficiencies and recognizing the potential for improvement. Science 332, 805–809 (2011).
Google Scholar
Hitchcock, A. et al. Redesigning the photosynthetic light reactions to enhance photosynthesis—the PhotoRedesign consortium. Plant J. 109, 23–34 (2022).
Google Scholar
Ennist, N. M. et al. De novo design of proteins housing excitonically coupled chlorophyll special pairs. Nat. Chem. Biol. 20, 906–915 (2024).
Google Scholar
Ennist, N. M., Stayrook, S. E., Leslie Dutton, P. & Moser, C. C. Rational design of photosynthetic reaction center protein maquettes. Fronti. Mol. Biosci. 9, 997295 (2022).
Google Scholar
Barber, J. & Tran, P. D. From natural to artificial photosynthesis. J. R. Soc. Interface 10, 20120984 (2013).
Google Scholar
Romero, E., Novoderezhkin, V. I. & van Grondelle, R. Quantum design of photosynthesis for bio-inspired solar-energy conversion. Nature 543, 355–365 (2017).
Google Scholar
Bahrami, A. A., Payandeh, Z., Khalili, S., Zakeri, A. & Bandehpour, M. Immunoinformatics: in silico approaches and computational design of a multi-epitope, immunogenic protein. Int. Rev. Immunol. 38, 307–322 (2019).
Google Scholar
Tsuboyama, K. et al. Mega-scale experimental analysis of protein folding stability in biology and design. Nature 620, 434–444 (2023).
Google Scholar
Wittmann, B. J. et al. Strengthening nucleic acid biosecurity screening against generative protein design tools. Science 390, 82–87 (2025).
Google Scholar
Wang, X. et al. De Novo design of integrin α5β1 modulating proteins to enhance biomaterial properties. Adv. Mater. 37, e2500872 (2025).
Google Scholar
Wang, X. et al. Tuning insulin receptor signaling using de novo-designed agonists. Mol. Cell https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molcel.2025.09.020 (2025).
Google Scholar
Ho, S. P. & Degrado, W. F. Design of a 4-helix bundle protein: synthesis of peptides which self-associate into a helical protein. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 109, 6751–6758 (1987).
DiMaio, F., Leaver-Fay, A., Bradley, P., Baker, D. & André, I. Modeling symmetric macromolecular structures in Rosetta3. PLoS ONE 6, e20450 (2011).
Google Scholar
Huang, P.-S. et al. High thermodynamic stability of parametrically designed helical bundles. Science 346, 481–485 (2014).
Google Scholar
Padilla, J. E., Colovos, C. & Yeates, T. O. Nanohedra: using symmetry to design self assembling protein cages, layers, crystals, and filaments. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 98, 2217–2221 (2001).
Google Scholar
Lai, Y.-T., Cascio, D. & Yeates, T. O. Structure of a 16-nm cage designed by using protein oligomers. Science 336, 1129 (2012).
Google Scholar
Hsia, Y. et al. Design of multi-scale protein complexes by hierarchical building block fusion. Nat. Commun. 12, 2294 (2021).
Google Scholar
King, N. P. et al. Computational design of self-assembling protein nanomaterials with atomic level accuracy. Science 336, 1171–1174 (2012).
Google Scholar
Fallas, J. A. et al. Computational design of self-assembling cyclic protein homo-oligomers. Nat. Chem. 9, 353–360 (2017).
Google Scholar
Sheffler, W. et al. Fast and versatile sequence-independent protein docking for nanomaterials design using RPXDock. PLoS Comput. Biol. 19, e1010680 (2023).
Google Scholar
